Are we stimulated yet?

I wrote a post a couple of months ago which talked about the falsity of the “Obama’s plan will create 4 million jobs” claim. In that post I used the projections of Obama’s own economic team to make my point.

Today I decided to revisit those projections, taken from their January 10 report, and see how we’re doing. Obviously it’s still very early, but it’s possible even at this stage to ask:

  1. Is anything good happening?, and
  2. How competent are these economists at projecting even 3 months into the future?

So here’s the answer:
stimulus-employment
All I did was take the Obama team’s graph right out of their report, and add the maroon triangle to represent the unemployment as of the end of March (8.5% – though I’ll admit that it’s not clear to me where the quarters start and stop). And what do we see?

  • Obama’s plan was supposed to keep unemployment from exceeding 8%. Fail.
  • Obama’s plan was supposed to keep unemployment from matching the rate without the plan. Fail.
  • Obama’s team provided us with a 5-year projection, but they’re completely off track after only 1 quarter. Epic Fail.

As you can see, we’re already 2/3 of the way to what was supposed to be the worst case: 9% unemployment.

It’s almost like the criticisms that the plan didn’t focus on near-term jobs creation were well-founded.

About these ads

2 Responses to “Are we stimulated yet?”

  1. xbradtc Says:

    Yay! Graphs and charts!

    I think we are generally in agreement as to the efficacy of government solutions to non-governmental problems…

  2. Lemur King Says:

    Sadly, we don’t even know that we are 2/3 of the way there yet. Well, socialism as our recovery plan will either help it or make it a whole lot worse, right?

    “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.”– Margaret Thatcher


Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: